I don't even know who reads this blog besides Peter, but....

>> Thursday, December 6, 2007

If you could buy/rent a place that was a standard price regardless of location (this is completely hypothetical), would you live closer to or within a city? Within a major suburban hub? Somewhere more rural?


I am completely serious. I'm researching market-value influences on residential location choices. Just a quick answer is fine.

I appreciate it! :)


Peter December 6, 2007 at 4:02 PM  

I love your blog and read it virtually everyday. It would depend on where I work. I would probably choose to live in the Suburbs. I've pretty much always lived in the Suburbs and the reduced cost of living makes up for any thing lost by the commute.

Follow me on twitter!

About Me

My photo
Tia Nicole Photography has launched this summer after many practice photo sessions and the encouragement of some dear friends and family ("Life Through Tia's Lens" was a recommendation of my good friend, Kristin, who has been an avid supporter the whole way through!). This blog has documented the process from the beginning and also dates back to some older rantings during grad school and football seasons. Feel free to get to know me and my work. I like to focus primarily on natural shots, true emotions and beautiful landscapes. I also absolutely adore kids and pets so you will find a good bit of my work in these areas. Feel free to contact me anytime! I love blog comments!

My pup, Rylynn!

  © Blogger templates Romantico by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP